Responsible research and innovation meets multispecies studies: why RRI needs to be a more-than-human exercise

18Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We offer an argument for why responsible research and innovation should be in conversation with multispecies studies. We suggest that RRI can learn from multispecies studies to expand definitions of stakeholders and responsibilities, thereby including other creatures in conversations and frameworks where they are currently missing. In addition, the RRI community might benefit from exploring conceptual overlaps between RRI and multispecies studies literatures. For example, concepts germane to RRI–notably, care and relationality–have been particularly well-developed with respect to how they oblige mutually responsive relationships. Consequently, connecting these two areas of theory and practice should nuance discussions about responsibility as an individual versus a collective endeavor and about the relationship between RRI and knowledge production.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szymanski, E. A., Smith, R. D. J., & Calvert, J. (2021). Responsible research and innovation meets multispecies studies: why RRI needs to be a more-than-human exercise. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 8(2), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1906040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free