Experimental design approach to the optimization of PAHs bioremediation from artificially contaminated soil: Application of variables screening development

28Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of bioremediation systems for PAH-contaminated soil may be constrained by physicochemical properties of contaminants and environmental factors. Information on what is the most effective factor in bioremediation process is essential in the decision of what stimulations can be taken to assist the biodegradation efficacy. Methods: In this study, four factors of surfactant (Tween 80), humic acid (HA), salinity and nutrients in a 2 4 full factorial design were screened in bioremediation of phenanthrene contaminated soil by using a consortium of bacteria. Results: Between the employed levels of the factors only salinity had not significant effect. Optimal concentrations of surfactant, HA and nutrient were obtained by a response surface design. For phenanthrene biodegradation, a central composite face centred design (CCFD) showed that nutrient, surfactant and HA concentrations had highly significant, significant and insignificant effects, respectively. The best conditions with 87.1% phenanthrene biodegradation were 150 mg HA/Kg soil, 12.68 μg/L surfactant, and nutrients as K 2 HPO 4, 0.8; KH 2 PO 4, 0.2 and KNO 3, 1 g/L. A high similarity was between the model prediction and experimental results. Conclusions: This study showed that nutrient with 81.27% efficiency could be considered as the most effective factor for practical implications of bioremediation process for PAHs contaminated soil cleanup strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ravanipour, M., Kalantary, R. R., Mohseni-Bandpi, A., Esrafili, A., Farzadkia, M., & Hashemi-Najafabadi, S. (2015). Experimental design approach to the optimization of PAHs bioremediation from artificially contaminated soil: Application of variables screening development. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-015-0178-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free