Induction, labor length and mode of delivery: The impact on preeclampsia-related adverse maternal outcomes

12Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective:The objectives were to evaluate whether induction, specifically prolonged labor, was associated with adverse maternal outcomes related to preeclampsia with severe features (PEC-S) and whether cesarean affected the rate.Study Design:This was a retrospective cohort study of women with PEC-S ≥34 weeks who were diagnosed either before planned cesarean or before induction/latent labor. The primary outcome was a composite adverse maternal outcome related to PEC-S.Results:The final cohort comprised 193 women (n=172 with labor and n=21 with planned cesarean). The prevalence of the outcome was 15.5%. Women exposed to labor did not have a higher rate compared with planned cesarean (16.3% vs 9.5%, P=0.4). Adjusting for confounders, women with a cesarean after prolonged labor had a 10-fold higher adverse outcome risk compared with women with a planned cesarean (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 9.7 (1.2 to 78.6), P=0.03) or with a vaginal delivery <24 h (aOR 9.7 (1.4 to 67.4), P=0.02).Conclusion:Prolonged labor and cesarean in labor were both associated with an increase in our outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levine, L. D., Elovitz, M. A., Limaye, M., Sammel, M. D., & Srinivas, S. K. (2016). Induction, labor length and mode of delivery: The impact on preeclampsia-related adverse maternal outcomes. Journal of Perinatology, 36(9), 713–717. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.84

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free