Current performance measurement methods are a-contextual and unable to measure the effectiveness of policies. They usually result in rankings that measure the extent of the policy problem, but they fail to reveal anything substantive about the quality of policies, and they are equally unhelpful in the search for best practices. The goal of this article is to further develop and validate a mixed method of performance measurement - a combination of statistical analysis, residue analysis and case study approach - which considers the policy context, relates the outcomes to the policies, and provides guidance in the systematic search for best practices. In this article, this approach will be tested against one of the problems mentioned in the Millennium Development Goals, e.g. literacy rates. Points for practitioners Many practitioners struggle with the question how to determine whether their performance is above or below expectations. Classic performance measures can give a distorted view on this question. Using the method introduced in this article might give a better picture of the robustness and effectiveness of performance than the traditional performance measures. It adapts to the adversity of the context and circumstances in which policies come about. © The authors, 2010.
CITATION STYLE
de Vries, M. S. (2010). Performance measurement and the search for best practices. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309365668
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.