Writing on Death: Plague Narratives. A Review Essay

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay discusses several books, ancient and recent, on plagues to ask the question: Can we face death without turning away from it through historical narration? Can we write about death, which only afflicts individuals, without stripping death of its individuality? After briefly addressing these questions, I discuss five books, one from the ancient period (Thucydides's Peloponnesian War), one from the late medieval period (Giovanni Boccaccio's The Decameron), one from the early modern period (Daniel Defoe's A Journal of the Plague Year), and two from the modern period (Mary Shelley's The Last Man, and Frank Snowden's Epidemics and Society). These books not only come from different eras but also reflect different written responses to death - ancient history, story/fable, reportage, futuristic novel, and contemporary history. The essay concludes by considering a counterargument to its focus on death, an argument developed by Baruch Spinoza which claims that humans should think nothing less than of death.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meng, M. (2022, January 20). Writing on Death: Plague Narratives. A Review Essay. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417521000451

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free