Gender Differences in Climbing up the Ladder: Why Experience Closes the Ambition Gender Gap

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Women are unequally represented in the highest positions in society. Beyond discrimination and bias, women are missing from the top because they are less likely to pursue high-ranking opportunities. We propose that experience is a critical moderator of gender differences in pursuing leadership opportunities, with low-experience women being particularly unlikely to seek higher level positions. We used field analyses of 96 years of U.S. senator and governor elections to examine male and female politicians’ propensity to run for higher political offices. As predicted, among those with little political experience, women were less likely than men to run for higher office, but experience closed this gender gap. A preregistered experiment among U.S.-based adults replicated the field findings and revealed that it was the increased self-confidence of experienced women that reduced the gender gap. The findings suggest experience, and the self-confidence that comes with it, is one lever for closing the gender gap in seeking to climb professional hierarchies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wald, K. A., Abraham, M., Pike, B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2024). Gender Differences in Climbing up the Ladder: Why Experience Closes the Ambition Gender Gap. Psychological Science, 35(11), 1287–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241266778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free