Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal echocardiography: A comparison of two Doppler methods with thermodilution

24Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study assessed the agreement between three methods of cardiac output (CO) measurement, thermodilution, the current clinical standard, and two transoesophageal echocardiographic techniques. Measurements were performed in 37 patients using thermodilution, continuous wave Doppler across the aortic valve and pulsed wave Doppler positioned in the left ventricular outflow tract. The aortic valve area was measured by direct planimetry, and the left ventricular outflow tract area was calculated from its diameter. Weighted least products regression analysis was employed to detect bias, and standard deviation of the difference (SDiff) was calculated. There was no fixed bias but there was proportional bias between continuous wave Doppler and thermodilution methods (SDiff 0.92 l/min). There was fixed bias but not proportional bias between pulsed wave and thermodilution methods (SDiff 1.1 l/min). There was neither fixed nor proportional bias between pulsed wave and continuous wave Doppler methods (SDiff 1.1 l/min). The transoesophageal Doppler methods described can be clinical alternative to thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Royse, C. F., Royse, A. G., Blake, D. W., & Grigg, L. E. (1999). Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal echocardiography: A comparison of two Doppler methods with thermodilution. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 27(6), 586–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9902700605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free