CAD and 3d-printing integration experience in the curriculum of engineers education

  • Zelentsov V
  • Shcheglov G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper examines the results of using the 3d-printing educational methodology for training the students in the spacecraft-configuration developing area. The first purpose of the considered methodology practice is to implement the rapid-prototyping skills into the educational process, to provide perfection of the student knowledge in configuring the internal on-board equipment of the spacecraft. The second purpose – is to habituate the students to the main principles of the available CAM technologies, to fill the available educational gap in the area of information support of the spacecraft life-cycle. The proposed curriculum includes six training exercises based on a special “Engineering drawing” course unit. The training exercises require using the SolidWorks geometric-simulation software. The preliminary obtained virtual prototypes of the spacecraft configuration elements are subjected to 3d-printing and assembled into a physical configuration model. The physical configuration models are obtained using one of the most accessible rapid-prototyping technologies – 3d-printing of extrusion type. Practicing in 3d-printing provides developing the student skills in managing all other digital-program control devices. The specified first experience of integrating the computer geometricsimulation methodology and the 3d-printing practices in a single course unit has proved: developing the physical-configuration models heightens the student interest to the configuration training. A ready-made physical model does not excuse the available configuration mistakes unlike a virtual model where the component interferences may remain undetected. So, developing a physical model requires additional endeavor and responsibility. Developing a project in a team has proved to be an effective means for solving a common creative problem. The first test of the proposed methodology has shown the importance of perfect adjustment of the available 3d-printing process and the Slicer program. The part-model manufacture cycle requires approximately from 2 to 3 hours per a component (from 1 to 1.5 hours for 3d-printing in that account). Large-scale blocks shall represent an assembly (containing a block body and a lid) to reduce the printing-plastic consumption. Average printing-plastic consumption is about 1 kg per a configuration model. The obtained 3d-printing experience shows that the printing speed is much more important than the printing accuracy for the given educational problem. The obtained educational-methodology test results are considered to be a success. It is recommended to purchase an additional high-productivity 3d-printer facility providing an effective fascinating spacecraftconfiguration process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zelentsov, V. V., & Shcheglov, G. A. (2016). CAD and 3d-printing integration experience in the curriculum of engineers education. Open Education, (5), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-5-27-34

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free