Systematic Exploration of Countertransference Phenomena in the Treatment of Patients at Risk for Suicide

19Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite its critical role in clinical suicidology, empirical evidence on the nature of countertransference (CT) to patients at risk for suicide (PRS) is lacking. This study aimed to provide a systematic description of CT phenomena to PRS. Psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychotherapists completed the Therapist Response Questionnaire (TRQ) online, with reference to a PRS. Factor analysis (n = 267) yielded a 7-factor structure, including 1) entrapped/rejecting, 2) fulfilled/engaging, 3) aroused/reacting, 4) informal/boundary crossing, 5) protective/overinvolvement, 6) ambivalent/inconsistent, and 7) mistreated/controlling. On average, clinicians reported that CT dimensions tended to not apply to them, except for the positively connoted factor. Our findings suggest that patients at risk for suicide elicit specific dimensions of CT. We offer two alternative interpretations of clinicians’ CT endorsement patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soulié, T., Bell, E., Jenkin, G., Sim, D., & Collings, S. (2020). Systematic Exploration of Countertransference Phenomena in the Treatment of Patients at Risk for Suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 24(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2018.1506844

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free