The Efficacy, Safety, and Optimal Regimen of Corticosteroids in Sepsis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: Conventional systematic reviews have indicated that corticosteroids might result in a slight reduction in mortality in sepsis. However, the efficacy, safety, and optimal regimen of different corticosteroids partly remain unknown. In this study, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis for a head-to-head comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of currently used corticosteroids in sepsis. Design: A Bayesian network meta-analysis for a head-to-head comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of currently used corticosteroids in sepsis. Setting: A total of 35 eligible randomized controlled trials of corticosteroid use in sepsis. Patients: The present Bayesian network meta-analysis included 8,859 patients with sepsis. Interventions: Randomized controlled trials were screened from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 28, 2019. A head-to-head comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between the different categories of corticosteroids from the trials was conducted by Bayesian network meta-analysis. An empirical Bayesian meta-regression and a post hoc Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to explore the appropriate dose and therapeutic duration of steroids for sepsis. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 35 randomized controlled trials including 8,859 patients with sepsis were enrolled in the final analysis. Bayesian network meta-analysis revealed that methylprednisolone and dexamethasone might be more effective in reducing short-term mortality in sepsis than placebo: methylprednisolone versus placebo (relative risk, 0.65, 95% credible interval 0.40-0.93), dexamethasone versus placebo (relative risk, 0.42, 95% credible interval, 0.24-0.84). Hydrocortisone and hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone were superior to placebo in days to shock resolution (e-Table 5, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCX/A150): hydrocortisone versus placebo (mean difference, -1.70, 95% credible interval, -2.83 to -0.92), hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone versus placebo (mean difference, -2.54, 95% credible interval, -4.19 to -0.84). Hydrocortisone was superior to placebo in reducing the length of stay in the ICU (mean difference, -1.43, 95% credible interval, -3.36 to -0.15). Methylprednisolone was superior to placebo in improving ventilation-free days (mean difference, 7.71, 95% credible interval, 1.15-14.42). In addition, further analysis indicated that the optimal therapeutic dosage was 200-400 mg per day of hydrocortisones or equivalents (relative risk, 0.83, 95% credible interval, 0.64-0.98), and the appropriate therapeutic duration was 4-7 days (relative risk, 0.78; 95% credible interval, 0.57-0.96). Conclusions: This study provided moderate evidence that the dosage of 200-400 mg per day of hydrocortisone or equivalent for 4-7 days was most likely to benefit septic patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, S., Chang, W., Xie, J., Wu, Z., Yang, Y., & Qiu, H. (2020, April 7). The Efficacy, Safety, and Optimal Regimen of Corticosteroids in Sepsis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Critical Care Explorations. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free