Open versus closed IV infusion systems: A state based model to predict risk of catheter associated blood stream infections

9Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the change in risk of central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) following the introduction of a closed infusion container in intensive care units (ICUs) in two Latin American cities. Design: A state-space model was used to describe the flow of admissions through the ICU. This approach correctly treats infection as a time-dependent covariate. Results: A closed system reduced the risk of CLABSI. The hazard ratios for the closed versus open container were between 0.15 and 0.31 (p values<0.001), indicating a clinically significant reduction in the risk of admissions having a CLABSI. A simulation study showed that a closed system reduced the number of infections, costs and deaths. Conclusions: The data reveal costs are saved and health benefits gained from fewer cases of CLABSI after adoption of a closed infusion system. Information is required on the costs of implementing the closed system widely in these settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graves, N., Barnett, A. G., & Rosenthal, V. D. (2011). Open versus closed IV infusion systems: A state based model to predict risk of catheter associated blood stream infections. BMJ Open, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free