Is mutual recognition a viable general path for cooperation?

12Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 1999, mutual recognition was declared to be the cornerstone of judicial cooperation not only, but also in criminal matters within the European Union (EU). Often this method seems to be regarded as a result of the close European integration and thus an invention of the EU. This article tries to show that even in traditional judicial assistance cases a similar trend could be witnessed and that mutual recognition is also applied – to a more or less intensive degree – in other regions and also in other areas of the law. In the author’s view, mutual recognition is a dynamic concept; its potential degree of realization depends on a number of contextual preconditions. As a result of the comparative view, he maintains that an ‘ordre public-proviso’ is a necessary ‘outlet’ and not at all outdated, especially in the context of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Satzger, H. (2019). Is mutual recognition a viable general path for cooperation? New Journal of European Criminal Law, 10(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419836516

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free