Acute coronary syndrome at early age. Description of a cohort. Is the risk being properly stratified?

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To describe the demographic, echocardiographic, angiographic characteristics, clinical presentation, habits, history, and outcomes of patients younger than 50 years attended for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method: An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was performed, with univariate and bivariate analysis that included information of patients treated at a third level clinic in Medellín, Colombia. Results and conclusions: 127 cases were identified where 79.5% were men and the most frequent type of ACS was NSTEMI (43%) followed by STEMI (23%). The most prevalent risk factors were overweight, obesity, and changes in the lipid profile (high triglycerides and low HDL), with low prevalence in smoking and diabetes mellitus. 78% of the cases had preserved LVEF with the presence of segmental contractility disorders on baseline echocardiography in 55% of the patients. 20% had severe coronary heart with 3 or more vessel disease. The most frequently compromised coronary artery was the LAD (58.2%). GRACE, Killip-Kimball and TIMI risk scales classified the patients as low risk, being congruent with the hospitalized patients with a mortality rate of 0%; However, clinical criteria should prevail when making decisions about the stratification method and the place (in-hospital or outpatient setting). The need to establish proto-cols for a functional and structural evaluation of coronary artery microcirculation in patients with a suggestive clinical history, ECG, and positive ischemia induction tests, despite having coronary angiography without epicardial lesions, is demanded.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mejía-Zuluaga, M., Castaño-Cifuentes, O., Arroyave-Carvajal, A., Duque-Ramírez, M., Vásquez-Trespalacios, E. M., & Quintero-Yepes, V. (2022). Acute coronary syndrome at early age. Description of a cohort. Is the risk being properly stratified? Revista Colombiana de Cardiologia, 29(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.24875/RCCAR.M22000117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free