Abstract
Background and Aims: Most paediatric infammatory bowel disease [IBD] studies are performed after medications are approved in adults, and the majority of participants in these studies are adolescents. We hypothesised that adolescent-onset IBD is not fundamentally different from adult-onset IBD. If this is correct, the value of delaying access to novel drugs in adolescents becomes questioned. Methods: Data from 11 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adult Phases 2 and 3 trials of four biologics were analysed. Participants were categorised as having adolescent-or adult-onset disease [diagnosed 12 to <18 years old at diagnosis; 836 participants [32.4%] received placebo. Of 3708 participants with UC, 221 were 12-<18 years old at diagnosis; 1212 [33%] were receiving placebo. The majority of the ratios of ORs were within 2-fold, suggesting that responses in adolescent-and adult-onset participants are generally similar. Conclusion: Data presented lend support for extrapolating effcacy of biologics from adults to adolescents with IBD, which would facilitate earlier labelling and patient access.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rosh, J. R., Turner, D., Hyams, J. S., Dubinsky, M., Griffths, A. M., Cohen, S. A., … Conklinj, L. S. (2024). Outcomes in adult infammatory bowel disease clinical trials: Assessment of similarity among participants with adolescent-onset and adult-onset disease. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, 18(8), 1250–1260. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae030
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.