Association of daily step volume and intensity with cardiometabolic risk in older adults

7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To investigate the association of daily step volume and intensity with cardiometabolic risk in older adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 248 community-dwelling older adults (66.0 ± 4.6 years; 78 % females). The daily step volume and intensity were assessed using accelerometry. Cardiometabolic risk was defined using a continuous metabolic syndrome score (cMetS). The participants were categorized according to their daily step volume (inactive <5000; low active 5000–7499; active 7500–9999; highly active 10,000+ steps/day), and intensity (peak 30-min cadence; lowest, < 40; low, 40–59; average, 60–79; high, 80–99; highest, 100+ steps/min). Generalized linear models were used for data analyses. Results: The active (β = −0.29, p = 0.040) and the highly active (β = −0.40, p = 0.026) groups had lower cMetS compared to the inactive group. No significant difference was found between the low active and inactive groups (β = −0.21, p = 0.098). Every increment of 1000 steps/day was associated with a decrease of 0.06 in cMetS (p < 0.001). The average (β = −0.37, p = 0.028), high (β = −0.42, p = 0.015), and highest (β = −0.81, p = 0.001) groups had lower cMetS than the lowest group. No significant difference was observed between the low and lowest groups (β = −0.22, p = 0.192). Every increment of 10 steps/min in the peak 30-min cadence was associated with a decrease of 0.07 in cMetS (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Daily step volume and intensity were inversely associated with cardiometabolic risk in community-dwelling older adults in a dose-response manner.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cabral, L. L. P., Browne, R. A. V., Freire, Y. A., Silva, R. de M., Vliestra, L., Waters, D. L., … Costa, E. C. (2023). Association of daily step volume and intensity with cardiometabolic risk in older adults. Experimental Gerontology, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2023.112245

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free