Chelated- and nano iron fertilization affects nutrient uptake and translocation in fresh market tomatoes

11Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of nano and chelated Fe fertilization on nutrient and heavy metals uptake and their translocation from soil to root, stem, leaf, and fruits of fresh market tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicon, cv. Sunbrite). A completely randomized design in a factorial experiment, with two Fe sources (nano vs. chelated) applied at 0 (control), 10, 20, and 40 mg/L via drip-irrigated plasticulture, was conducted. Nutrient and heavy metals concentrations in soil, water, tomato roots, stems, leaves, and fruits were determined. Soil had higher K, Fe, Ca, Mg, P, and Mn but lower Ni, Cd, and Cr concentrations. The P, K, Fe, Cu, Mn, and Na concentrations in the roots were significantly affected by both nano and chelated Fe fertilization; however, without following a consistent pattern. Averaged across the Fe treatments, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, and P that translocated from the soil were dominated in the roots, stems, and leaves. The nutrient translocation order, from roots to fruits in response to Fe fertilization, was nano Fe (40%) > chelated Fe (37%) > control (23%). Based on the treatment index values calculated across treatments, it is evident that Fe fertilization plays a pivotal role in nutrient uptake and translocation. The use of chelated Fe at a concentration of 20 mg/L had a pronounced effect on improving the nutritional quality of the tomatoes and, by extension, their associated public health benefits. In conclusion, the chelated Fe (20 mg/L) stands out as the most preferable and effective Fe fertilization for tomatoes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arifur Rahman, M., Harker, T., Lewis, W., & Islam, K. R. (2024). Chelated- and nano iron fertilization affects nutrient uptake and translocation in fresh market tomatoes. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 47(7), 1152–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2304166

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free