Comparative Study of Conventional and Emerging Extraction Methods for Papaya Seed Oil: Process Optimization and Quality Evaluation

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Papaya seed oil (Carica papaya) is gaining interest for its potential applications as a functional food ingredient. Papaya seeds, usually discarded as agro-industrial waste, represent a valuable source of oil rich in unsaturated fatty acids. This study evaluated several extraction methods, including Soxhlet extraction, maceration, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), hydraulic pressing, and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), using pure ethanol and pure isopropanol as green solvents. Soxhlet extraction with hexane for 24 h at 121 °C achieved the highest yield (30.91 ± 0.49%) and was used as the reference. Among the greener techniques, UAE performed at 400 W for 30 min with isopropanol achieved the best compromise between yield (22.50 ± 0.27%) and oil quality, showing the lowest acidity index (9.00 ± 2.16 mg KOH/g). Therefore, UAE was selected for further optimization by varying ultrasound power (0–400 W), extraction time (5–30 min), and solvent composition (isopropanol, 50:50 ethanol–isopropanol mixture, and ethanol). The optimal extraction conditions were 200 W for 30 min using a 1:1 ethanol-isopropanol solvent mixture, which resulted in an extraction yield of 26.34%, corresponding to an oil recovery of approximately 85% relative to the Soxhlet reference. The mixed solvent enhanced extraction efficiency by improving mass transfer through the combined effects of solvent polarity and ultrasonic cavitation, confirming that ultrasound-assisted extraction with green solvent mixtures is an effective method for papaya seed oil recovery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Assaf, N., Metouekel, A., Rhayem, L., Guerin, C., Tabib, M., Liu, S., … Grimi, N. (2026). Comparative Study of Conventional and Emerging Extraction Methods for Papaya Seed Oil: Process Optimization and Quality Evaluation. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-025-04083-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free