Biomechanical Analysis of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Configurations for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tapes: A Cadaveric Study

19Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the acromioclavicular (AC) joint stability of single-bundle (SB), double-bundle with an anterolateral limb (DBa), double-bundle with a posterolateral limb (DBp), and triple-bundle (TB) coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstructions using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes. Methods: Eight cadaveric shoulders were used. AC joint translation and rotational stability were tested for intact and following 4 different CC reconstruction techniques: SB, DBa, DBp, and TB configurations using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes. For each reconstruction and native AC joint as control, anteroposterior (AP) and superoinferior translations were quantified using 10- and 15-N translational loads and anterior and posterior rotations were measured using 0.16- and 0.32-Nm rotational torque. Results: DBp reconstruction showed significantly better AP stability compared with SB and DBa reconstruction at 10 and 15 N (DBp: 4.1 ± 0.6 mm, SB: 7.8 ± 1.1 mm, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, I., Itami, Y., Hedayati, B., Bitner, B., McGarry, M. H., Lee, T. Q., & Shin, S. J. (2018). Biomechanical Analysis of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Configurations for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tapes: A Cadaveric Study. Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 34(11), 2983–2991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free