Comparative resistance of AH26 and a new sealer prototype to a bacterial challenge

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. This study compared the leakage resistance of a New Sealer Prototype (NSP) with a traditional sealer (AH 26) in Resilon-filled roots subjected to a bacterial challenge. Study Design. 41 roots were instrumented to ISO size 50 apically. Group 1 (n=20) contained Resilon and AH 26 sealer and roots in group 2 (n=21) contained Resilon and NSP. Roots were embedded in a dual-chamber model with the upper chamber containing Streptococcus mutans inoculum. Evidence of bacterial penetration was observed for 1 month. Fisher's Test was used to analyze the data. Results. 8 of 20 roots (40%) in the AH 26 group demonstrated leakage whereas 3 of 21 roots (14%) in the NSP group leaked. The difference in leakage rates was not statistically significant (P=0.053). Conclusion. The traditional sealer (AH 26) demonstrated increased leakage rates compared to the New Sealer Prototype (NSP), but the difference did not reach statistical significance in this study. © 2012 Derek Duggan et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duggan, D., Zhong, S., Rivera, E., Arnold, R., & Simmons, E. (2012). Comparative resistance of AH26 and a new sealer prototype to a bacterial challenge. International Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/365231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free