Abstract
Objective. This study compared the leakage resistance of a New Sealer Prototype (NSP) with a traditional sealer (AH 26) in Resilon-filled roots subjected to a bacterial challenge. Study Design. 41 roots were instrumented to ISO size 50 apically. Group 1 (n=20) contained Resilon and AH 26 sealer and roots in group 2 (n=21) contained Resilon and NSP. Roots were embedded in a dual-chamber model with the upper chamber containing Streptococcus mutans inoculum. Evidence of bacterial penetration was observed for 1 month. Fisher's Test was used to analyze the data. Results. 8 of 20 roots (40%) in the AH 26 group demonstrated leakage whereas 3 of 21 roots (14%) in the NSP group leaked. The difference in leakage rates was not statistically significant (P=0.053). Conclusion. The traditional sealer (AH 26) demonstrated increased leakage rates compared to the New Sealer Prototype (NSP), but the difference did not reach statistical significance in this study. © 2012 Derek Duggan et al.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Duggan, D., Zhong, S., Rivera, E., Arnold, R., & Simmons, E. (2012). Comparative resistance of AH26 and a new sealer prototype to a bacterial challenge. International Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/365231
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.