Abstract
The taxonomic histories of Pterodactylus antiquus and other pterodactyloids from the Upper Jurassic plattenkalks of southern Germany are long and complex, reflecting centuries of intricate and often contentious research. Among the most debated issues in pterosaur taxonomy is the relationship between Pterodactylus antiquus and Diopecephalus (Pterodactylus) kochi. Three distinct interpretations of their relationship have been proposed: (1) P. antiquus and D. kochi are conspecific and part of an ontogenetic sequence; (2) P. antiquus and D. kochi are sister taxa; (3) P. antiquus and D. kochi are distinct taxa and are not each other's closest relatives. Through an analysis of key anatomical features, including skull morphology, dentition and autopodial anatomy, we demonstrate that P. antiquus and D. kochi are distinct taxa that do not share close affinities. Phylogenetic analysis recovered D. kochi as the most basal member of Pterodactyloidea, retaining autopodial features comparable with those of non-pterodactyloids. Set within a temporal framework, this analysis challenges traditional assumptions regarding the pattern and timing of pterodactyloid evolution in the Jurassic, hinting at a longer and more complex history than previously realized.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Smyth, R. S. H., & Unwin, D. M. (2024). Re-evaluation of Pterodactylus antiquus and Diopecephalus kochi: two troublesome taxonomic concepts. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2024.2421845
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.