15-Gene Expression Profile and PRAME as Integrated Prognostic Test for Uveal Melanoma: First Report of Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study No. 2 (COOG2.1)

50Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE Validated and accurate prognostic testing is critical for precision medicine in uveal melanoma (UM). Our aims were to (1) prospectively validate an integrated prognostic classifier combining a 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) and PRAME RNA expression and (2) identify clinical variables that enhance the prognostic accuracy of the 15-GEP/PRAME classifier. MATERIALS This study included 1,577 patients with UM of the choroid and/or ciliary body AND METHODS who were enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study Number 2 (COOG2) and prospectively monitored across 26 North American centers. Test results for 15-GEP (class 1 or class 2) and PRAME expression status (negative or positive) were available for all patients. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS). RESULTS 15-GEP was class 1 in 1,082 (68.6%) and class 2 in 495 (31.4%) patients. PRAME status was negative in 1,106 (70.1%) and positive in 471 (29.9%) patients. Five-year MFS was 95.6% (95% CI, 93.9 to 97.4) for class 1/PRAME(–), 80.6% (95% CI, 73.9 to 87.9) for class 1/PRAME(1), 58.3% (95% CI, 51.1 to 66.4) for class 2/ PRAME(–), and 44.8% (95% CI, 37.9 to 52.8) for class 2/PRAME(1). By multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, 15-GEP was the most important independent predictor of MFS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.95 [95% CI, 4.43 to 7.99]; P < .001), followed by PRAME status (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.42 to 2.33]; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harbour, J. W., Correa, Z. M., Schefler, A. C., Mruthyunjaya, P., Materin, M. A., Aaberg, T. A., … Zhang, S. (2024). 15-Gene Expression Profile and PRAME as Integrated Prognostic Test for Uveal Melanoma: First Report of Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study No. 2 (COOG2.1). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 42(28), 3319–3329. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00447

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free