The first Swedish read & publish agreement: An evaluation of the springer compact pilot

10Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we summarise the lessons learned from the first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: Springer Compact with Springer Nature (2016-07-01–2018-12-31). We set out to put the Swedish agreement in an international context and to examine the effects of the agreement regarding economy, publication outcome, administration and researchers’ attitudes and practices in Sweden. Publication data, economic data, as well as survey data from administrative staff and corresponding authors were collected and analysed. Based on the analyses, the advantages and disadvantages of Read & Publish agreements are discussed. The advantages include increase in Open Access (OA) publishing, improved OA workflows and ease for researchers. The disadvantages include the risk of conserving the current system and its associated high costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olsson, L., Francke, H., Lindelöw, C. H., & Willén, N. (2020). The first Swedish read & publish agreement: An evaluation of the springer compact pilot. LIBER Quarterly, 30(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10309

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free