Pluripotency of a founding field: rebranding developmental biology

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The field of developmental biology has declined in prominence in recent decades, with off-shoots from the field becoming more fashionable and highly funded. This has created inequity in discovery and opportunity, partly due to the perception that the field is antiquated or not cutting edge. A 'think tank' of scientists from multiple developmental biology-related disciplines came together to define specific challenges in the field that may have inhibited innovation, and to provide tangible solutions to some of the issues facing developmental biology. The community suggestions include a call to the community to help 'rebrand' the field, alongside proposals for additional funding apparatuses, frameworks for interdisciplinary innovative collaborations, pedagogical access, improved science communication, increased diversity and inclusion, and equity of resources to provide maximal impact to the community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rogers, C. D., Amemiya, C., Arur, S., Babonis, L., Barresi, M., Bartlett, M., … Brady, S. M. (2024). Pluripotency of a founding field: rebranding developmental biology. Development (Cambridge), 151(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.202342

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free