Nutrients and flow shape the cyclic dominance games between Escherichia coli strains

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Evolutionary game theory has provided various models to explain the coexistence of competing strategies, one of which is the rock-paper-scissors (RPS) game. A system of three Escherichia coli strains - a toxin-producer, a resistant and a sensitive - has become a classic experimental model for studying RPS games. Previous experimental and theoretical studies, however, often ignored the influence of ecological factors such as nutrients and toxin dynamics on the evolutionary game dynamics. In this work, we combine experiments and modelling to study how these factors affect competition dynamics. Using three-dimensional printed mini-bioreactors, we tracked the frequency of the three strains in different culturing media and under different flow regimes. Although our experimental system fulfilled the requirements of cyclic dominance, we did not observe clear cycles or long-term coexistence between strains. We found that both nutrients and flow rates strongly impacted population dynamics. In our simulations, we explicitly modelled the release, removal and diffusion of toxin. We showed that the amount of toxin that is retained in the system is a simple indicator that can predict competition outcomes across broad parameter space. Moreover, our simulation results suggest that high rates of toxin diffusion might have prevented cyclic patterns from emerging in our experimental system. This article is part of the theme issue 'Half a century of evolutionary games: a synthesis of theory, application and future directions'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuhn, T., Junier, P., Bshary, R., Terrettaz, C., Gonzalez, D., & Richter, X. Y. L. (2023). Nutrients and flow shape the cyclic dominance games between Escherichia coli strains. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1876). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0503

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free