One-month subchronic toxicity study of cell-penetrating peptides for insulin nasal delivery in rats

59Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recently, cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) based vehicles have been developed for the delivery of different payloads in animals. Our studies have shown that nasal absorption of insulin and other therapeutic peptides and proteins can be improved significantly by co-administration of the CPP penetratin. Successful development of suitable CPP-based delivery systems, however, will depend not only on the efficiency of CPPs to transport therapeutic agents across the biological barriers of the nasal cavity, but also on the risk of adverse effects such as toxicity and undesired immunogenicity, especially in chronic therapy. In this study, we investigated the bioavailability (BA) of insulin and the adverse effects on the nasal mucosa in rats following a long-term dosing regimen of l-penetratin and the novel penetratin analogue "PenetraMax." Following nasal delivery, a significantly higher BA for insulin (almost 100% relative to subcutaneous (s.c.) injections) was observed for PenetraMax in comparison with the parent penetratin peptide after chronic administrations in rats. Importantly, there was negligible biomarker leakage in nasal lavage fluid and the integrity of the nasal epithelium remained unaffected when PenetraMax was used in long-term multiple administrations. In addition, no significant difference in the release of inflammatory and immunogenicity mediators in plasma was observed after nasal administration of PenetraMax with or without insulin solution. In conclusion, PenetraMax, a novel CPP candidate, can open a new avenue in clinical trials for noninvasive nasal insulin delivery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khafagy, E. S., Kamei, N., Nielsen, E. J. B., Nishio, R., & Takeda-Morishita, M. (2013). One-month subchronic toxicity study of cell-penetrating peptides for insulin nasal delivery in rats. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 85(3 PART A), 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.09.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free