Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: A prospective audit

90Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To define the current success rate of primary retinal detachment repair at one centre. Methods: One hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients undergoing surgery for primary retinal detachments over a 6 month period were studied prospectively. Data sheets were completed immediately after surgery and at final follow-up. One hundred and twenty-seven patients completed 6 months of follow-up. Follow-up data on the remainder were obtained from the referring unit or directly from the patients by telephone. The term primary success was used to describe persisting retinal reattachment after a single operation. Multiple logistic regression was carried out to establish factors associated with failure. Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients (80%) had persisting retinal reattachment after a single procedure. Of the 30 patients who required further surgery, in 5 the retina remained detached at final follow-up. The final anatomical success rate was 97%. New or missed breaks were the major causes of failure of primary surgery. Failure of primary surgery was associated with the presence of highly elevated breaks (β = 0.11, p = 0.03). No other pre-operative factors appeared to predict failure to reattach the retina. Conclusions: Comparison of these results with those of a previous audit carried out at this hospital 23 years ago suggests little improvement in the success rate of primary surgery (75% vs 80%). The improvement in final retinal reattachment has been rather greater (from 88% to 97%). The major impact of recent technical advances in retinal reattachment surgery has been on the success rate of reoperations after failed primary surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sullivan, P. M., Luff, A. J., & Aylward, G. W. (1997). Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: A prospective audit. Eye, 11(6), 869–871. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free