Abstract
This analysis of a case of a bereaved patient that poses two treatment options-watchful waiting or medication-focuses on five “polarities” in clinical practice: (1) the normal and the pathological, (2) the individual and the diagnostic collective, (3) the primary care physician and the consultant, (4) the expert and nonexpert, and (5) the moment and the process. These polarities can accentuate ethical problems posed by this case, for example, by creating stark contrasts that mask the complex contexts of care and characteristics of patients. These stark contrasts can create false dilemmas that may obscure simpler, shared decision-making solutions. Alternatives to conceiving cases in terms of polarities are discussed.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sadler, J. Z. (2017). Polarities in clinical thinking and practice. AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.ecas1-1702
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.