Polarities in clinical thinking and practice

0Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This analysis of a case of a bereaved patient that poses two treatment options-watchful waiting or medication-focuses on five “polarities” in clinical practice: (1) the normal and the pathological, (2) the individual and the diagnostic collective, (3) the primary care physician and the consultant, (4) the expert and nonexpert, and (5) the moment and the process. These polarities can accentuate ethical problems posed by this case, for example, by creating stark contrasts that mask the complex contexts of care and characteristics of patients. These stark contrasts can create false dilemmas that may obscure simpler, shared decision-making solutions. Alternatives to conceiving cases in terms of polarities are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sadler, J. Z. (2017). Polarities in clinical thinking and practice. AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.ecas1-1702

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free