Damage to appalachian hardwoods from diameter-limit harvesting and shelterwood establishment cutting

15Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Residual stand damage was assessed in 10 ac stands harvested with either a 12 in. diameter-limit harvest, a 16 in, diameter-limit harvest or an establishment cut of the shelterwood method. Each stand was logged using manual felling and cable skidding; treatments were replicated four times. The 12 in. diameter-limit harvests had the lowest residual basal areas but residual stems had the highest percentage of damage and largest stem wounds. In all three treatments, as tree size (dbh) increased and distance to skid trail increased, the probability of individual tree damage decreased.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fajvan, M. A., Knipling, K. E., & Tift, B. D. (2002). Damage to appalachian hardwoods from diameter-limit harvesting and shelterwood establishment cutting. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 19(2), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/19.2.80

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free