Abstract
The sensitivity and specificity of surveillance for Clostridium difficile infections according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, codes were compared with laboratory results as standard. Sensitivity was 35.6%; specificity was 99.9%. Concordance between the 2 methods was moderate. Surveillance based on ICD-10 codes underestimated the rate based on laboratory results.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jones, G., Taright, N., Boelle, P. Y., Marty, J., Lalande, V., Eckert, C., & Barbut, F. (2012). Accuracy of ICD-10 codes for surveillance of clostridium difficile infections, France. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 18(6), 979–981. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1806.111188
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.