Conceptions of Research Methods Learning Among Psychology Undergraduates: A Q Methodology Study *

10Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A range of conceptions held about research methods learning have previously been identified. This study aimed to examine in-depth shared conceptions among undergraduate psychology students. Utilizing Q methodology, which links both quantitative and qualitative methodologies to uncover the subjective viewpoints that a group of individuals hold toward a particular domain, participants ranked statements reflecting different conceptions of research methods learning. Ranks were then factor analyzed and four distinct profiles of student conceptions were identified, labelled, and described in qualitative detail: research methods as integral to psychology, research methods as a digression from psychology, research methods as disconnected from psychology, and research methods as beneficial to psychology. Some of the perspectives displayed a clear understanding about the reasons for undertaking research and learning about research methods in psychology, whereas other standpoints saw research as being something that was difficult to relate to the practice of psychology. Findings are considered in terms of how some conceptions appear to be more beneficial or problematic to hold than others and recommendations are made to educators about how they could support students to change their views.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balloo, K., Pauli, R., & Worrell, M. (2018). Conceptions of Research Methods Learning Among Psychology Undergraduates: A Q Methodology Study *. Cognition and Instruction, 36(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1494180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free