Comparison of flexible laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation in adenotonsillectomy surgery

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotracheal tube (ETT) group (n=30). The groups were compared according to intubation time, heart rate, SpO2, EtCO2, airway pressure, surgical field of view, and recovery time. Both the insertion time and recovery time were shorter in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (16.93±4.84 s vs. 23.93±8.74 s; and 10±2 min vs. 14.5±3 min; p<0.001 both). The airway pressure measurements at 5-min intervals were significantly lower in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (p<0.001). F-LMA may be a useful alternative to ETT for adenotonsillectomy surgery because it is safe, provides shorter induction and recovery times, reduces intraoperative airway pressure, and provides an adequate operative field of view.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duran, M., Kuşderci, H., & Uludağ, O. (2022). Comparison of flexible laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation in adenotonsillectomy surgery. Acta Clinica Croatica, 61(4), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free