The COCA quality model for user documentation

0Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

According to Pedraz-Delhaes, users evaluate both the product and the vendor on the basis of provided documentation. Thus, a question arises as to what quality characteristics should be taken into account when making a decision about accepting a given user manual. There are some proposals (e.g., ISO Std. 26513 and 26514), but they contain too many quality characteristics and lack orthogonality. The goal of this paper is to propose a simple quality model for user documentation, along with acceptance methods based on it. The model is to be orthogonal and complete. As a result, the COCA quality model is presented, which comprises four orthogonal quality characteristics: Completeness, Operability, Correctness, and Appearance. To check completeness, the proposed quality model has been compared with many other quality models that are directly or indirectly concerned with user documentation. Moreover, two acceptance methods are described in the paper: pure review based on ISO Std. 1028:2008, and documentation evaluation test (a type of browser evaluation test), which is aimed at assessing the operability of user documentation. Initial quality profiles have been empirically collected for both methods—they can be used when interpreting evaluation results obtained for a given user manual.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alchimowicz, B., & Nawrocki, J. R. (2016). The COCA quality model for user documentation. Software Quality Journal, 24(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9252-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free