Interpretation as intervention in science and technology studies: revisiting methods as epistemic practices

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Science and technology studies (STS) scholarship explores the production and institutional contexts of scientific knowledge. As such, it has examined research methods in both the natural and social sciences, framing such methods as necessarily intervening in the worlds they describe and explore. We discuss central concepts that STS mobilizes to engage with methods, in particular by introducing the notion of the “method assemblage” and its implications for interpretive methods. In doing so, we draw on our academic work to describe key ways in which STS has characterized research methods and to discuss what this might mean for other accounts of interpretive approaches. We argue that, as with any other method assemblage, interpretive methods can be understood as performative epistemic practices that enact the worlds – social, natural, political, and historical – that they purport to describe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mora-Gámez, F., Schikowitz, A., & Davies, S. R. (2025). Interpretation as intervention in science and technology studies: revisiting methods as epistemic practices. In Handbook of Interpretive Research Methods in the Social Sciences (pp. 153–165). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803926391.00017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free