‘… they had interpreted “disability” as referring to a patently visible disability’: experience of a patient group with NICE

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder characterised by intolerance to visible light. Starting in early childhood, people with EPP suffer from social isolation, impaired educational and occupational opportunities, and low quality of life. Afamelanotide is the only effective and approved therapy for EPP. In England, its cost-effectiveness is currently assessed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), which in 2018 issued a negative recommendation for funding. Stakeholder organisations, including our patient organisation, submitted appeals against the recommendation, which were upheld in all possible grounds. Moreover, the appeal panel expressed concerns about whether the evaluating committee discriminated against people with EPP and suggested that it seek guidance regarding the Equality Act 2010. However, three years later, the identified issues have not been addressed and patients in England remain without treatment. Afamelanotide represents another example for the trend towards a loss of fairness in NICE decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barman-Aksözen, J., Granata, F., Aksözen, M. H., Dechant, C., & Falchetto, R. (2022). ‘… they had interpreted “disability” as referring to a patently visible disability’: experience of a patient group with NICE. Disability and Society, 37(7), 1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2060804

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free