Degradation of silk films in multipocket corneal stromal rabbit models

24Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The need for human cornea tissues continues to grow as an alternative option to donor tissues. Silk protein has been successfully used as a substrate to engineer corneal epithelium and stroma in vitro. Herein, we investigated the in vivo response and the effect of silk crystalline structure (beta sheet) on degradation rate of silk films in rabbit multipocket corneal models. Methods: Three different surgical techniques (peripheral-median P-M, central-superficial C-S, central-deep C-D) were used to assess the in vivo response as well as the degradation profile of silk films with low, medium and high beta sheet (crystalline) content at 2 and 3 months after surgery. Results: Approach C-D showed signs of sample degradation without inflammation, with one single incision and a pocket created by flushing air two thirds deep in the corneal stroma. In comparison, approaches P-M and C-S with multiple incisions presented manually dissected surgical pockets resulted in inflammation and possible extrusion of the samples, respectively. Low beta sheet samples lost structural integrity at 2 months after surgery C-D, while medium and high beta sheet content films showed initial evidence of degradation. Conclusions: The in vivo response to the silk films was dependent on the location of the implant and pocket depth. Crystallinity content in silk films played a significant role in the timing of material degradation, without signs of inflammation and vascularization or changes in stromal organization.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghezzi, C. E., Wang, L., Behlau, I., Rnjak-Kovacina, J., Wang, S., Goldstein, M. H., … Kaplan, D. L. (2016). Degradation of silk films in multipocket corneal stromal rabbit models. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials, 14(3), e266–e276. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000274

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free