Habitat type and macroinvertebrate assemblages in low order Patagonian streams

39Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Benthic macroinvertebrate community structure was studied with respect to stream habitat type in four low-order Patagonian streams (Argentina). Seven habitat types were sampled during high and low water periods in each river. Boulders, cobbles, pebbles and gravels were sampled in run/riffle sections, whereas sand, leaf packs and macrophytes were sampled in pools. Run-riffles supported higher densities and biomasses of invertebrates than sand in pools but had densities similar to those in macrophytes. Benthic organic matter was highest in leaf packs in pools (4.21 g DM/ 0.1 m2) and was composed of leaf fragments, wood and entire leaves. The dry weight of organic matter among boulders, cobbles and pebbles in riffles areas ranged from 0.69 to 0.85 g DM/0.1 m2. Detrended correspondence analysis showed that species assemblages differed seasonally, and that species associations differed markedly among substrata and rivers. Proportions of five functional feeding groups differed among habitats, although gatherers were dominant in most habitat types. Shredders and collector-gatherers co-dominated numerically in leaf packs but shredder biomass was highest among boulders and gravels. Filterers were numerically dominant on macrophytes and gravels, whereas scrapers were common on all riffle substrata. At the habitat scale, current velocity, water temperature and organic matter availability appear to be major factors affecting the distribution and abundance of Patagonian stream invertebrates. Our results provide baseline data on poorly studied river systems whose integrity is threatened by sediment inputs from forestry and agriculture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Velásquez, S. M., & Miserendino, M. L. (2003). Habitat type and macroinvertebrate assemblages in low order Patagonian streams. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 158(4), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0158-0461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free