Bringing the men back in: Sex Differentiation and the Devaluation of Women's Work

371Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To reduce sex differences in employment outcomes, we must examine them in the context of the sex-gender hierarchy. The conventional explanation for wage gap—job segregation—is incorrect because it ignores men's incentive to preserve their advantages and their ability to do so by establishing the rules that distribute rewards. The primary method through which all dominant groups maintain their hegemony is by differentiating the subordinate group and defining it as inferior and hence meriting inferior treatment. My argument implies that neither sex-integrating jobs nor implementing comparable worth will markedly improve women's employment status because men can subvert these mechanisms or even change the rules by which rewards are allocated. As evidence, I show that occupational integration has failed to advance women appreciably, and I argue that comparable worth is not likely to be much more effective. Instead, we must seek political analyses and political solutions. © 1988, SAGE PUBLICATIONS. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reskin, B. F. (1988). Bringing the men back in: Sex Differentiation and the Devaluation of Women’s Work. Gender & Society, 2(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002001005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free