Commentary on "performance of a glucose meter with a built-in automated bolus calculator versus manual bolus calculation in insulin-using subjects"

6Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since the early 2000s, there has been an exponentially increasing development of new diabetes-applied technology, such as continuous glucose monitoring, bolus calculators, and "smart" pumps, with the expectation of partially overcoming clinical inertia and low patient compliance. However, its long-term eficacy in glucose control has not been unequivocally proven. In this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Sussman and colleagues evaluated a tool for the calculation of the prandial insulin dose. A total of 205 insulin-treated patients were asked to compute a bolus dose in two simulated conditions either manually or with the bolus calculator built into the FreeStyle InsuLinx meter, revealing the high frequency of wrong calculations when performed manually. Although the clinical impact of this study is limited, it highlights the potential implications of low diabetesrelated numeracy in poor glycemic control. Educational programs aiming to increase patients' empowerment and caregivers' knowledge are needed in order to get full benefit of the technology. © Diabetes Technology Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rossetti, P., Vehí, J., Revert, A., Calm, R., & Bondia, J. (2012). Commentary on “performance of a glucose meter with a built-in automated bolus calculator versus manual bolus calculation in insulin-using subjects.” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. Diabetes Technology Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681200600219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free