Avaliação comparativa de efeitos adversos no uso do soro antiofídico trivalente liofilizado e soros antiofídicos líquidos no acidente botrópico

9Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Snake bite, a problem in public health, generally occurs where there is no electric power. Methods: A comparative clinical study was conducted with 102 victims of Bothrops snake bite, from the state of Amazonas, Brazil; 58 victims were treated with liofilizated trivalent antivenom serum (SATL) and 44 victims treated with liquid bivalent and monovalent antivenom serum (SAMBL). Results: 17% (10/58) of patients presented adverse effects with the SATL and 25% (11/44) with the SAMBL. Conclusions: There was no statistic difference in number of adverse effects between the two types of snake bite antivenom.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

da Silva, I. M., & Tavares, A. M. (2012). Avaliação comparativa de efeitos adversos no uso do soro antiofídico trivalente liofilizado e soros antiofídicos líquidos no acidente botrópico. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 45(4), 523–525. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822012000400022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free