Renaissance scholasticism and the reception of the Aristotelian doctrine on the natural just: Philipp Melanchthon & Francisco Suárez

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The scholastic interpretation of Aristotle focuses on the idea of the natural law to justify the pre-political foundations of social reality. Now, there is no single great scholastic synthesis, nor is there a single Aristotelianism that is common to all the scholastic commentators of Ethica Ε 7. Thus, Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), the so-called præceptor Germaniæ, depicts a different understanding of Aristotle than the Jesuit Francisco Suárez (1548-1617), because, as we will show, Suárez understands the just by nature as the right of practical reason, whereas Melanchthon identifies it with the theoretical knowledge of the moral principles implanted by God in man.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aguirre, S. C., & Besa, A. H. (2021). Renaissance scholasticism and the reception of the Aristotelian doctrine on the natural just: Philipp Melanchthon & Francisco Suárez. Bajo Palabra, (26), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2021.26.011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free