Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy surgery in different age groups

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To comparatively investigate the efficacy, safety and complications of flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) in the treatment of patients of different age groups (<60, 60-74 and ≥75 years) with proximal ureteral and kidney stones. Study Design: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Urology, HSU Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, HSU Ankara Diskapi Training, Research Hospital, and Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, between March 2014 and June 2020. Methodology: Nine hundred and fifty-six patients, who underwent f-URS due to proximal ureteral and kidney stones, were divided into three age groups as <60 years (Group 1), 60-74 years (Group 2) and ≥75 year (Group 3). The patients' American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), anticoagulant use, stone-free rates and surgical and medical complication rates were examined for each group. Results: There were 688 patients in Group 1, 230 in Group 2, and 38 in Group 3. A significant difference was observed between the age groups in terms of CCI and anticoagulant use (p<0.001 for both). The highest rate of medical complications was observed in Group 3 at 42.1%, followed by Group 2 at 17.8%, while the lowest rate was observed in Group 1 at 2.3% (p<0.001). As a result of the multivariate analysis, receiving anticoagulant treatment (p=0.002) and having a high CCI (p=0.005) were independent predictors of medical complication development. Conclusion: It was clearly demonstrated that f-URS could be used as a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of moderate-size kidney stones in all age groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koras, O., Bozkurt, I. H., Karakoyunlu, A. N., Polat, S., Yarimoglu, S., & Degirmenci, T. (2021). Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy surgery in different age groups. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 31(6), 679–685. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2021.06.679

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free