MP-AzeFlu is more effective than fluticasone propionate for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children

57Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of MP-AzeFlu (Dymista®) vs fluticasone propionate (FP), (both 1 spray/nostril bid), in children with allergic rhinitis (AR). MP-AzeFlu combines azelastine hydrochloride, FP and a novel formulation in a single spray. Children were randomized in a 3 : 1 ratio to MP-AzeFlu or FP in this open-label, 3-month study. Efficacy was assessed in children aged ≥ 6 to <12 years (MP-AzeFlu: n = 264; FP: n = 89), using a 4-point symptom severity rating scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). Over the 3-month period, MP-AzeFlu-treated children experienced significantly greater symptom relief than FP-treated children (Diff: −0.14; 95% CI: −0.28, −0.01; P = 0.04), noted from the first day (particularly the first 7 days) and sustained for 90 days. More MP-AzeFlu children achieved symptom-free or mild symptom severity status, and did so up to 16 days faster than FP. MP-AzeFlu provides significantly greater, more rapid and clinically relevant symptom relief than FP in children with AR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berger, W., Bousquet, J., Fox, A. T., Just, J., Muraro, A., Nieto, A., … Wahn, U. (2016). MP-AzeFlu is more effective than fluticasone propionate for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 71(8), 1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12903

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free