Numbness after transradial cardiac catheterization: The results from a nerve conduction study of the superficial radial nerve

20Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Numbness on the hand occurs infrequently after a transradial cardiac catheterization (TRC). The symptom resembles that of neuropathy. We, therefore, investigated the prevalence, the predicting factors and the presence of neurological abnormalities of numbness, using a nerve conduction study (NCS). Subjects and Methods: From April to December 2013, all patients who underwent a TRC were prospectively enrolled. From among these, the patients who experienced numbness on the ipsilateral hand were instructed to describe their symptoms using a visual analogue scale; subsequently, NCSs were performed on these patients. Results: Of the total 479 patients in the study sample, numbness occurred in nine (1.8%) following the procedure. The NCS was performed for eight out of the nine patients, four (50%) of which had an abnormal NCS result at the superficial radial nerve. A larger sheath and history of myocardial infarction (p=0.14 and 0.08 respectively) tended towards the occurrence of numbness; however, only the use of size 7 French sheaths was an independent predictor for the occurrence of numbness (odds ratio: 5.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-28.58, p=0.042). The symptoms disappeared for all patients but one, within four months. Conclusion: A transient injury of the superficial radial nerve could be one reason for numbness after a TRC. A large sheath size was an independent predictor of numbness; therefore, large sized sheaths should be used with caution when performing a TRC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jang, H. J., Kim, J. Y., Han, J. D., Lee, H. J., Kim, J. S., Park, J. S., … Kim, T. H. (2016). Numbness after transradial cardiac catheterization: The results from a nerve conduction study of the superficial radial nerve. Korean Circulation Journal, 46(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.161

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free