Questionable Claims for Simple Versions of the Bootstrap

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent years have seen increasing interest in incorporating resampling methods into introductory statistics courses and the high school mathematics curriculum. While the use of permutation tests for data from experiments is a step forward, the use of simple bootstrap methods for sampling situations is more problematical. This article demonstrates via counterexamples that many of the claims made for these simple methods are simply wrong. Their use with beginners can only be justified after their true properties have been fully researched, and their many limitations explained to students. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayden, R. W. (2019). Questionable Claims for Simple Versions of the Bootstrap. Journal of Statistics Education, 27(3), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2019.1669507

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free