Discretion-as-Politics in Immigration Processes: The Case of Unaccompanied Migrant Children in the US

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Trump administration’s anti-immigration measures affected dramatically the lives of unaccompanied migrant children (unaccompanied minors-UAMs) at the Southern border. This article investigates how and the extent to which the ‘discretionary power’ of immigration officials served the political objective of obstructing UAMs’ prospects of immigration relief. By drawing on qualitative empirical data, this article finds that border officials and the Attorney General employed ‘discretion-as-politics’ to block UAMs’ prospects of regularizing their immigration status in the US, which was consistent with the political agenda of the Trump administration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iusmen, I. (2023). Discretion-as-Politics in Immigration Processes: The Case of Unaccompanied Migrant Children in the US. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 21(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.1978605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free