The legal limits to the destruction of natural resources in non-international armed conflicts: Applying international humanitarian law

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article analyzes whether and to what extent energy resources fulfil the definition of military objective within the meaning of international humanitarian law (IHL) and customary IHL. In order to bring conceptual clarity to the duty to protect the natural environment in armed conflict, the article explores the legal limits to the destruction of energy resources (that are part of the natural environment) controlled by armed non-State actors during non-international armed conflicts (NIACs). It examines the practice of the United States, which characterizes the destruction of the natural environment during hostilities as being related to targets that contribute to the war-sustaining capability of enemies. Conceptual light is shed on the legality of attacks on oil refineries and installations during NIACs as a matter for IHL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagheri, S. (2023). The legal limits to the destruction of natural resources in non-international armed conflicts: Applying international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 105(923), 882–913. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383123000139

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free