Long-Term Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Medicare Population

  • Schermerhorn M
  • Buck D
  • O’Malley A
  • et al.
487Citations
Citations of this article
342Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BackgroundRandomized trials and observational studies have shown that perioperative morbidity and mortality are lower with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm than with open repair, but the survival benefit is not sustained. In addition, concerns have been raised about the long-term risk of aneurysm rupture or the need for reintervention after endovascular repair. MethodsWe assessed perioperative and long-term survival, reinterventions, and complications after endovascular repair as compared with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in propensity-score–matched cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent repair during the period from 2001 through 2008 and were followed through 2009. ResultsWe identified 39,966 matched pairs of patients who had undergone either open repair or endovascular repair. The overall perioperative mortality was 1.6% with endovascular repair versus 5.2% with open repair (P<0.001). From 2001 through 2008, perioperative mortality decreased by 0.8 percentage points ...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schermerhorn, M. L., Buck, D. B., O’Malley, A. J., Curran, T., McCallum, J. C., Darling, J., & Landon, B. E. (2015). Long-Term Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Medicare Population. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1405778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free