Higher-than-conventional subcutaneous regular insulin doses in diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of initial insulin dosage on glycemic control in the first 48 hours of subcutaneous regular insulin therapy after resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Methods: Records of patients with DKA hospitalized in the past 3 years [n=76, median age=10.0 (6.0-12.0) years, Male/Female: 44/32] were reviewed. The patients were designated into two groups according to distribution of starting doses of subcutaneous insulin. Group 1 (n=28) received a median dose of 1.45 U/kg/day (1.41-1.5) and group 2 (n=48) a median dose of 0.96 U/kg/day (0.89-1). Clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. Results: Median, minimum, and maximum blood glucose levels of Group 1 in the first 48 hours of treatment were significantly lower than that of Group 2 [213 (171-242) vs. 255 (222-316), p=<0.001; 102 (85-151) vs. 129 (105-199), p=0.004; and 335 (290-365) vs. 375 (341-438), p=0.001, respectively]. The number of patients who experienced hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) were similar [Group 1, 5 (17.9%) vs. Group 2, 4 (8.3%), p=0.276] and none had severe hypoglycemia. In Group 1, the ratio of blood glucose levels within the target range (100-200 mg/dL) were higher (37.5% vs. 12.5%) and the number of results >200 mg/dL were lower (50% vs. 81.3%) compared to Group 2 (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: After resolution of DKA, a higher initial dose of 1.4-1.5 U/kg/day regular insulin is associated with better glycemic control in children and adolescents without an increase in risk of hypoglycemia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bağ, Ö., Tunç, S., Nalbantoğlu, Ö., Ecevit, Ç., Öztürk, A., Özkan, B., & Demir, K. (2017). Higher-than-conventional subcutaneous regular insulin doses in diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents. JCRPE Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, 9(2), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.3925

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free