Brundlefly at SemEval-2016 task 12: Recurrent neural networks vs. joint inference for clinical temporal information extraction

33Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We submitted two systems to the SemEval-2016 Task 12: Clinical TempEval challenge, participating in Phase 1, where we identified text spans of time and event expressions in clinical notes and Phase 2, where we predicted a relation between an event and its parent document creation time. For temporal entity extraction, we find that a joint inference-based approach using structured prediction outperforms a vanilla recurrent neural network that incorporates word embeddings trained on a variety of large clinical document sets. For document creation time relations, we find that a combination of date canonicalization and distant supervision rules for predicting relations on both events and time expressions improves classification, though gains are limited, likely due to the small scale of training data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fries, J. A. (2016). Brundlefly at SemEval-2016 task 12: Recurrent neural networks vs. joint inference for clinical temporal information extraction. In SemEval 2016 - 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Proceedings (pp. 1274–1279). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s16-1198

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free