Automated vs. Manual Counting of Bacterial Colonies Using Hough Circle Transform: A Comparative Study for E. coli, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bacterial colony enumeration is an essential stage in microbiological research, allowing susceptibility to antibiotics assessment, monitoring of the environment, and clinical diagnostics. This research compares automated bacterial colony counting using the Hough Circle Transform to traditional manual counting methods. Objectives include evaluating counting accuracy and efficiency. This study adopted the image processing approach to colonies of E. coli, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa. The proposed methodology achieved an overall accuracy of 95% for E. coli, 90% for S. aureus, and 84% for P. aeruginosa, with associated recall values of 95%, 91%, and 86%. The F-measure remained continuously high, ranging between 0.85 and 0.95. Regarding efficiency, manual counting required an average of 70 seconds per plate, while automated counting without and with visual correction took 30 seconds. The study contributes to improving laboratory efficiency, with implications for microbiological diagnostics. Future research is suggested to enhance preprocessing and segmentation techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rehman, A., Saleem, Z., Amjad, J., Shah, S. R., & Siddique, K. (2025). Automated vs. Manual Counting of Bacterial Colonies Using Hough Circle Transform: A Comparative Study for E. coli, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa. Journal of Computer Science, 21(10), 2312–2322. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2025.2312.2322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free